page 2.1

state issued documents

in new hampshire, a sparsely populated state with no large cities and very little industry, you can go up on any hill and see the smog stretching from horizon to horizon, rolling in from the heavy industries in the mid-west.

what isn't said is that all of this information, in one form or another, is a decade old, and was gathered almost eighty years after the inception of heavy industries. with the "recomendations", the politicians are playing very dangerous word games with what has been proven scientifically. in other words, as dramatic as it sounds,
                                               DON'T EAT ANYTHING.

we're speaking of just one specific form of polution.

for instance, for TUNA fish these same restrictions were quietly  publicized long ago and things have only gotten worse, but tuna is such a large industry and such a common part of children's diets that politicians and businessmen are afraid of panic.


 we are talking about    BRAIN DAMAGE.
 

how it works
the current president, george w. bush, has successfully fought not just citizens' groups and the scientific establishment but legal efforts by both governors and groups of state legislatures to reduce emmissions from heavy industries. why? so that his
unbelievably rich
friends can continue to make money.


we're conscerned about you
“our goal is to destroy, to eradicate, the  environmental movement...”
                    -ron Arnold
                     founder of the “wise use” movement, which uses a smoke screen of
christanity and environmental jargon
to hide rapacious “free enterprise.” he sounds like a pious man doesn’t he?

new hampster documents